Oups ! Sincèrement désolé. Dans mon énervement j'ai confondu. C'était une pub sur www.commentcamarche.net
Je vais repasser mon message sur leur site.

Quant à l'aspect illégal, j'ai sincèrement cru qu'en payant je pouvais décharger pour usage privé de leur propre catalogue.

Bon, je me serai fait truander, c'est bien fait pour ma gueule !

Encore une fois sincères excuses.

JLP

Bonjour,

If I had to choose, I would prfeer independent films to blockbusters.  Mainly for the same reasons that you already indicated.  Indie films concentrate on the story and acting more because they don't have the money for special effects.  But all a good movie needs is a good story, good acting, and good direction.Nowadays, it's actually harder to make a good big budget film because of all the distractions caused by the special effects and all the money to play with.  Just look at Transformers  not that Michael Bay was ever a brilliant director, but he was caught with a whole lot of money in the budget and sort of forgot there was a story to tell in 2 1/2 hours.  But then give the big budget to someone like Peter Jackson and he'll make gold.That's the main reason why the Oscar's Best Picture nominees have been dominated by independent films.  Not because the critics and the public prfeer different films.  It's because special effects is usually a distraction for big budget films and it makes it twice as hard for a filmmaker to really focus on the story and not the explosions.  Was this answer helpful?